Ricky Casino Review 2023 | Pros, Cons, Bonuses & Games

Payment methods: Visa, Mastercard, PayID, Maestro, Neosurf, Neteller, Skrill, ecoPayz, Paysafecard, Bitcoin

Minimum Deposit: $20

Number of games: Over 2,000+

Bonuses: Up to $7,500 + 550 free spins

Wagering requirements: 50x

  • More than 2,000 online pokies
  • Huge welcome bonus up to $7,500 + 550 free spins
  • Live dealer games, including roulette
  • Accepts cryptocurrency deposits
  • Bonuses and free spins expire after 3 days
  • No sports betting available

Ricky Casino is an excellent online casino, with more than 2,000+ slot games, plenty of table games, live dealer games, and even demo versions so you can play risk-free to your heart’s content. 

It comes #1 in my list of best online casinos, and you will see why as you take a look at my in-depth review covering various important aspects.

Games: 10/10

Ricky Casino offers a huge collection of casino games that will please anyone from a beginner to the most avid player. With over 2,000 games to choose from, spanning pokies, progressive jackpots, roulette, blackjack, and video poker, you are certain to find something that is up your alley. 

Ricky Casino’s games are developed by the best in the business – gaming giants like Micrograming, SoftSwiss, and NetEnt, just to name a few. When I tested over 70 titles, I could tell each game has been painstakingly created, and therefore are of the highest quality in terms of graphics, design, characters, and playability.

Bonuses: 9.7/10

Many casino players enjoy welcome offers, where you can receive free bonuses. This allows you to play more without spending extra money, and pick up additional chances to win a big jackpot. Ricky Casino does not disappoint, with a generous offer of up to $7,500 bonus plus 550 free spins, spread across the first 10 deposits. This is how the bonuses can be claimed by new users:

  • 1st Deposit – 100% Up To $500 / 240 USDT + 100 Free Spins.
  • 2nd Deposit – 50% Up To $500 / 240 USDT + 50 Free Spins.
  • 3rd Deposit – 50% Up To $1,000 / 240 USDT + 50 Free Spins.
  • 4th Deposit – 50% Up To $1,000 / 240 USDT + 50 Free Spins.
  • 5th Deposit – 50% Up To $1,000 / 240 USDT + 50 Free Spins.
  • 6th Deposit – 50% Up To $1,000 / 240 USDT + 50 Free Spins. Once per day.
  • 7th Deposit – 50% Up To $1,000 / 240 USDT + 50 Free Spins. Once per day.
  • 8th Deposit – 50% Up To $500 / 240 USDT + 50 Free Spins. Once per day.
  • 9th Deposit – 50% Up To $500 / 240 USDT + 50 Free Spins. Once per day.
  • 10th Deposit – 50% Up To $500 / 240 USDT + 50 Free Spins. Once per day.

From this breakdown, you can see that the first deposit is a 100% bonus, while the remaining 9 deposits are only 50%. I took advantage of this by making a larger deposit on my first go. That way I received more bonus than if I deposited the same amount  spread over a few deposits.

Note that the minimum deposit to receive the bonuses is $30. Additionally, keep in mind that the free spins are applied to one particular slot game “All Lucky Clovers 5”. I enjoyed playing this slot, especially because it was free to play!

One of the great things about Ricky Casino is that they offer ongoing bonuses even after your welcome offer is completed. These change from time to time, but currently if you deposit on a Tuesday, you will receive a 100% deposit bonus, on Wednesdays you receive 200 free spins with a $30 deposit, and on Fridays you receive 50% deposit bonus. If you are a high roller, and make large deposits (over $1,500), then you can qualify for the VIP offers; receive 30% bonus on deposit amounts of $1,500 – $3,000.

Deposits and Withdrawals: 9.8/10

Having plenty of banking options are a must for any top casino, and Ricky Casino meets this criteria. There are various methods you can choose to deposit and withdraw money, with no transaction fees whatsoever. The only thing you need to be wary of is the minimum and maximum limits, as shown below.

Deposit methods

  • Visa/Mastercard/Maestro: $20 to $4,000
  • Neosurf, Neteller, Skrill, ecoPayz: $20 to $4,000
  • Paysafecard: $20 to $1,000
  • Bitcoin: 0.0001 BTC to 5 BTC

Withdrawal methods

  • Visa: minimum $20
  • Virtual Credit Cards, Neteller, Skrill, ecoPayz: minimum $20
  • Paysafecard: minimum $20
  • Bank transfer: minimum $300
  • Bitcoin: minimum 0.0001 BTC

Mobile Gaming: 9.4/10  

Many Ricky Casino users love playing games on their phone as a way to pass time when they’re bored, eg: on public transport, at work, or even on the toilet! Being able to access an online casino on your phone is a huge benefit. Ricky Casino does not yet have a mobile app, but you can easily visit the casino using your internet browser on your phone. When I tested the casino on my phone and iPad, I found that the site is perfectly optimised for each device, and it runs smoothly, with no delays or latency issues.

Customer Support: 10/10  

Ricky Casino has excellent customer service, and I scored them a full 10 out of 10 in this regard. There is a dedicated live chat support team available 24/7, and they are extremely helpful, no matter what your issue. They are staffed by real customer support agents, and not chatbots, so you can trust they understand what you are asking. 

If you prefer to communicate using email, that’s another option available to you. Simply email [email protected], and they will respond when they get to your email. This can take up to a few hours, but often it happens much quicker. When I tested out their email responsiveness, I received a reply in under an hour.

Security and Licensing: 9.5/10  

Ricky Casino is a legitimate and secure online casino. It has an authoritative license from Curacao, an international standard that guarantees the most honest and transparent interaction with players. It also guarantees that all actions, policy, and framework of the casino are performed legally. You can play at Ricky Casino without worrying about safety issues.

Alternatives to Ricky Casino

While Ricky Casino is my top choice of online casino, you may want to consider other options to find one that is more suitable for your needs. See the top four online casinos below to see which is right for you.

Welcome Bonus: $7,500 + 550 free spins

Welcome Bonus: $7,500 + 550 free spins

  • Over 2,000+ games
  • Deposit with Visa, Mastercard, PayID, Maestro, Neosurf, Neteller, Skrill, ecoPayz, Paysafecard, Bitcoin
  • Minimum deposit: $20
  • Wagering requirements: 50x
Welcome Bonus: Up to $5,000

Welcome Bonus: Up to $5,000

  • Over 2,000+ games
  • Deposit with Visa, Maestro, Mastercard, Neosurf, Neteller, Skrill, ecoPayz, Paysafecard, Bitcoin
  • Minimum deposit: $20
  • Wagering requirements: 50x
Welcome Bonus: Up to $5,000

Welcome Bonus: Up to $5,000

  • Over 1,250+ games
  • Deposit with Visa, Maestro, Mastercard, Skrill, Neteller, ecoPayz, MiFinity, MuchBetter, STICPAY, Paysafecard, Bank transfer, Bitcoin
  • Minimum deposit: $20
  • Wagering requirements: 50x
Welcome Bonus: Up to $3,000

Welcome Bonus: Up to $3,000

  • Over 300+ games
  • Deposit with Visa, Mastercard, Voucher, Direct bank transfer, MatchPay, Cryptocurrency (BTC, ETH, USDT, LTC, BCH, BSV)
  • Minimum deposit: $5 for USDT; $10 for Voucher, BTC; $20 for Visa/Mastercard, MatchPay; $50 for Bank transfer, ETH
  • Wagering requirements: 25x


Ricky Casino is my #1 recommendation of the best online casino, and I suggest you try it out, if you are searching for a new casino. There are thousands of games available, plenty of deposit methods, excellent 24/7 live chat support, and tons of bonuses. It is licensed and regulated by the Curacao gaming authority so you can trust it is a safe, honest, and legitimate site.

Click the button below to visit Ricky Casino and discover everything it has to offer. Remember, you can play games for free without having to deposit money or even sign up! This is an excellent way to familiarise yourself with Ricky Casino before deciding whether you want to create an account.

Frequently Asked Questions

Yes, Ricky Casino is a legit online casino that is licensed and regulated by the Curacao Gaming Control Board. It is used by millions of players and many of them – including the team at Indivisible Gaming – consider Ricky Casino to be the best online casino.

Yes, Ricky Casino is a safe online casino that is licensed and regulated by the Curacao Gaming Control Board. It is trusted by millions of casino players, and is the best online casino.

Is Card Counting Illegal in Las Vegas?

There is absolutely no reason to worry about being handcuffed in the middle of a blackjack pit in Las Vegas for counting cards. Counting cards in Las Vegas is not against the law. Not only is card counting not illegal in Las Vegas, there are plenty of old-timers on the strip that will tell you that it was people like Edward Thorpe, the grandfather of card counting, that helped build Las Vegas into what it is today.

That being said, many casinos frown on moving your bet with the count, and being private businesses, they have every right to remove you from the floor and trespass you from the property. This is actually a two-edged sword, as the surveillance department will then send your picture out to many other properties. Most properties will then ask you to leave often before you’ve even made your first bet.

Can I get in trouble if caught?

What can and does get players arrested, especially after a couple of drinks, is not complying with security. If you find yourself in the unenviable position of being “walked”, don’t say anything and don’t touch anyone.

This isn’t the movies, they aren’t going to take you upstairs just to throw you down them. They just want to get you colored up and out the door with the least aggravation. But… should you touch one of them or perhaps even say something a bit hastily that you will regret in the morning, you will quickly find yourself on the floor in handcuffs with the police on their way.

In some cases, you might not even be asked to leave. Casinos have long ago discovered that just because you are attempting to count cards doesn’t mean that you are actually very good at it. Most novice card counters lose at the same rate as regular gamblers.

Casinos don’t have the people or the patience to watch your play for long, so they’ll ask you not to play blackjack anymore, or sometimes any table games, and leave you to the slots and video poker on the off chance you’re a degenerate gambler who happens to know a bit about card counting.

What Is Card Counting, And Why Isn’t It Illegal In Las Vegas?

What Is Card Counting, And Why Isn’t It Illegal In Las Vegas?

Card counting isn’t some sort of mental gymnastics that requires a Ph.D. It’s just keeping track of the high cards and low cards and betting more when there are lots of high cards. But this only works as the house advantage on Blackjack is quite low.

When casinos change the rules in their favor, you’ll need to bet more when the number of high cards are in your favor to overcome the new house odds. And some rule changes, like only paying 6/5 on blackjacks, are very difficult to overcome.

Using what cards have already been dealt to inform your betting and playing strategy is perfectly legal, but only when done without mechanical or electronic aid. People like Ken Uston built wearable computers as far back as the 1970s to try and beat the game. But the courts made clear that while using your brain was fine, outside aid wasn’t.

An interesting aside is that the Nevada Supreme Court has also found that using a dealer’s exposed hole card to inform your decisions isn’t illegal if you can see it unaided and, of course, the dealer isn’t showing it to you as an act of collusion.

Some things that will get you arrested include switching cards, adding/subtracting from your bet after the cards are dealt, using a computer or a phone to aid your play, using devices like a prism or camera to catch the dealer’s hole card, any sort of collusion with the dealer such as being overpaid on purpose or the dealer flashing you the next card before it’s dealt.

A Brief History Of Beatings and Blackjack In Las Vegas

When Bugsy Siegel opened the Flamingo Hilton in 1946, the population of Las Vegas was around twenty thousand. The mob would run this backward western town for the next three decades. By 1980 when most of the mob influence was on the wane, the town had grown to a metro-size area of over 500,000.

A Brief History Of Beatings and Blackjack In Las Vegas

As early as the 1950’s there are books by people who are beginning to lay out basic blackjack strategy and hint at counting. “Playing Blackjack to Win” was published 5 full years before Thorp’s seminal work “Beat the Dealer”. But Thorp’s computer-aided research caught the whole country’s imagination and even made the New York time best seller charts. 

As one might imagine, mathematically minded folks trying to beat the casinos and the mob weren’t a match made in heaven and much mayhem ensued. Thorp has even claimed that the mob tried to kill him in Las Vegas a few years after his book came out.

Ken Uston and a great many other card counters, some skilled and others not so much would also be on the wrong end of mob beatings over the years. Casinos often enforced their own justice up through most of the 1970s.  And this is where many people’s fears of card counting being illegal or punishable come from.

Ironically, after a short-lived panic, the casino managers up and down the strip realized that their now-packed blackjack tables were filled with people that believed the game to be beatable but lacked the skill to actually do it.  This belief that blackjack was vulnerable would fill blackjack tables and Las Vegas hotel rooms for decades to come.

Casinos would still make some changes to make the game a bit less favorable, first two decks, then as many as eight were added. The cut card was moved up so not as many cards were dealt out, rules like Five Card Charlie and surrender became a thing of the past. Not only did this lessen the pool of folks who could count cards profitably, but also the number of beatings that needed to be doled out.

The days of beatings are long gone, and about the only vestige left of the mob in Las Vegas is a museum downtown. The thrill of card counting and taking your shot at bringing down the house means there are still some who will risk it. And while the casino may ask you to leave if they believe you are counting cards, honestly, you are getting off lightly. No handcuffs and no bouncing down long flights of stairs.

Counting the human cost of financial crime, with Jinisha Bhatt.

We sit down with financial crime investigator, Jinisha Bhatt, to discuss the link between money laundering and human trafficking, the role of technology, and the importance of collaborative relationships.

When people talk about the ramifications of financial crime like money laundering, they often mention the impact to the financial system, or to a business, but you also talk about the ‘very human cost of financial crime’. Could you expound?

When I first began to investigate financial crime, what struck me most about incidents of money laundering, corruption, and human trafficking was how they serve to undermine legitimate businesses and governments, and in turn, society.  

You see the starkest impact of a corrupt, fincrime-ridden society on the most marginalized of groups. Indeed, there’s a direct correlation between the rate of fincrime and violent crime.

What is the link between money laundering, and, for example, human trafficking or exploitation? What non-financial impact would the eradication of financial crime have on society and humanity?

As financial inclusion is the means to a more peaceful, equitable and just society, the eradication of fincrime would enable an equal distribution of public and private wealth – away from the underbellies of the launderers and corrupt officials to the public.  

In turn, this would mean better social services, safer cities, better education, and a higher rate of social and economic mobilisation. 

The biggest driver of a prosperous nation is not only wealth, but equal and fair wealth distribution.

It is estimated that less than 1% of criminal proceeds from human trafficking and exploitation flowing through the banking system ever gets detected, and of that only 0.8% of traffickers are prosecuted – while a mere 0.2% of victims are rescued annually. What are the reasons for these weak numbers, especially the 1% detection rate?

Trafficking is a transient crime. If institutions fail to detect trafficking activity while it’s happening in a specific location, it is too late to pass on any intelligence to regulators and law enforcement. To improve detection measures, financial institutions could be more focused on creating non-transactional detection rules, such as frequent changes to device metadata and device language, frequent credit card cancellations, and frequent use of certain keywords in transaction memos. To strengthen intel-gathering measures, financial institutions could also:

  • Geomap frequently-used ATMIDs and/or branch locations
  • Run adverse media searches on client usernames/aliases
  • Conduct regular Open-Source Intelligence (OSINT) investigations on suspicious users and their associations.  

From first-hand experience, I am convinced that the biggest reason we fail at prosecuting criminals and rescuing victims is a lack of collaboration between, and within, the public and private sectors. One of the major explanations for a lack of collaboration are some very stringent and outdated privacy regulations. For example, many large institutions with substantial data sets work with legacy systems. There are many sophisticated AI and DLT-based tools that enable safe data-sharing in an encrypted manner.  

Another reason we struggle to rescue victims is a lack of victim-centered services. Many survivors struggle to find safe and prolonged housing, especially when they struggle with addiction. The lack of readily available and survivor-centered services contributes to a high revictimization rate. It is said that an average survivor is revictimized between 5-13 times before they are emancipated. And in this process, victims are financially excluded by institutions, especially when their credit rating and identity has been compromised by their perpetrators.

Could you talk a little more about your work in locating traffickers, in particular through the use of technology?

As a financial crime investigator, I came to realize that the industry’s approach to anti-trafficking investigations is fragmented. Data suggests that many countries have identified less than 1% of human trafficking victims in their jurisdiction. The rate of prosecution in many jurisdictions is also about 1%. My goal is to leverage technology and data to bridge the intelligence gap, and take in as many survivors as possible, while supporting law enforcement investigations. My team of volunteers and I implement various data, geomapping, and OSINT tools.  

For example, in partnership with data and machine learning engineers, we scrape escort ads on active escort forums in individual cities, then process the data, and deploy machine learning tools to predict where the most egregious of trafficking activity might be occurring.  

We then partner with Anti Money Laundering and OSINT investigators to create intel files on trafficking entities with a high-risk score.  

We then use geomapping tools to cluster and map the most illicit trafficking networks so that our field intelligence volunteers can approach victims and extract them in a safe manner. We also send our intelligence files to law enforcement organizations, financial regulators and non-profit partners.  

Our success is contingent upon true interdisciplinary action and many technological solutions.

Jinisha Bhatt, financial crime investigator.

Would you say this unique approach to financial crime investigations helps or hinders your work at times? What more can be done to educate institutions on the link between financial crime and human trafficking and terrorist financing?

I would say that this approach is a timely reminder that we need to look beyond a series of transactions and financial patterns when investigating financial crime. Often, the most profitable crimes are also the most egregious and vile, and financial institutions simply cannot combat them single-handedly. It’s not just a matter of getting ‘more education’; it’s about nuanced and scenario-based education from lived-experience experts. It is high time that institutions worked in tandem with survivors, governments, victim services, forensic services, law enforcement, and of course, each other.

You have recently shifted into the crypto sphere, is there a difference in the types of financial crime, or ease of financial crime execution, between crypto and tradfi?

My primary motivation to transition into crypto investigations was traceability and speed of transactions. Before I made the transition, I invested in a blockchain forensics designation and found myself beguiled by the infrastructure and the crypto compliance community at large. While many financial crime typologies are the same in defi and tradfi, as an investigator, I may have more transactional data at my disposal in the crypto space by virtue of distributed ledgers and block explorers. I also find myself conducting faster and proactive investigations while collaborating with other compliant crypto platforms.

What part does technology play in the detection of financial crime? As criminals continue to use increasingly advanced techniques, how can organizations stay one step ahead of the international networks to combat financial crime?

I believe our biggest challenge is the lack of effective and responsible info-sharing among organizations.

While individual organizations may have the best tools and talent at their disposal, their vantage allows them a narrow view of the juggernauts of financial crime operations.

Jinisha Bhatt, financial crime investigator.

If we aim to be proactive, we must work together and deploy the best technology that is interoperable and collaborative. Some of the best use cases of predictive AI I have seen have been deployed in the anti-financial crime sector. They were largely successful when multiple financial institutions forged collaborative partnerships to combat crimes like human trafficking.

If you’re interested in more insights from industry insiders and thought leaders, check out one of our interviews from our Fintech Spotlight Interview series below.


Counting the human cost of financial crime, with Jinisha Bhatt. 1

Jody Houton
Content Manager at IDnow
Connect with Jody on LinkedIn

Psikologi dalam Kehadiran Poker & Meja

Sekitar 31 tahun yang lalu, saya ingat dengan jelas diberitahu bahwa saya harus pergi tidur dan bahwa orang dewasa (dan sepupu saya yang lebih tua) akan memainkan permainan bridge yang serius. Saya mengamuk dan pergi ke kamar sambil menangis.

Saya berusia lima tahun, dan tidak dapat memahami mengapa saya tidak diizinkan untuk begadang, sementara sepupu saya yang berusia tujuh dan sembilan tahun diizinkan untuk bergabung dengan orang dewasa di meja kartu. Meskipun usia saya masih muda dan berjuang untuk mempertahankan 13 kartu, saya telah mempelajari aturan bridge dan sudah memiliki keahlian dalam permainan kartu.

Musim panas berikutnya, dan di semua musim panas berikutnya, saya diberi kesempatan untuk berpartisipasi dalam permainan jembatan itu. Seiring waktu, saya mendapatkan reputasi dalam keluarga sebagai salah satu pemain yang lebih agresif. Sebagai jembatan, tim yang berhasil menjadi tunas dan mencapai grand slam atau slam kecil (di mana Anda dan pasangan Anda memenangkan semua atau hampir semua 13 ‘trik’) diberikan sejumlah besar poin.

Meskipun ada hukuman karena gagal beralih ke slam, saya sering percaya bahwa potensi imbalannya lebih besar daripada risikonya, yang membuat anggota keluarga yang lebih berhati-hati kecewa. Maka, lahirlah seorang penjudi.


Alex Livingston dengan keluarganya berpegangan tangan

Tumbuh dewasa, bermain bridge selama berjam-jam setiap musim panas dan berkompetisi dalam turnamen catur nasional memainkan peran penting dalam membentuk identitas masa kecil saya.

“Sebelum menganggap diri saya sebagai pemain poker, saya mengidentifikasi diri sebagai pemain kartu, dan bahkan sebelum itu, saya melihat diri saya sebagai pencinta permainan. Saya selalu tertarik pada game yang melibatkan pemikiran strategis, dan yang paling membuat saya terpesona adalah aspek psikologis dari game tersebut.”

Saat bermain bridge, saya menemukan diri saya sama tertariknya, jika tidak lebih, dengan mengamati bagaimana lawan saya bermain dan gaya unik mereka, daripada hanya berfokus pada teori permainan konvensional. Meskipun membaca buku tentang teori jembatan cenderung membuat saya bosan, saya tidak pernah bosan mendiskusikan gerakan potensial dengan rekan satu tim atau lawan saya.

Saya terus berusaha memahami perspektif dan alasan mereka, selalu ingin tahu tentang pendekatan apa yang akan mereka ambil dalam situasi tertentu. Misalnya, saya sering merenungkan mengapa bibi Laura tidak memilih opsi kemahiran ketika tindakan agresif diperlukan.

Ketika saya menemukan poker bertahun-tahun kemudian, keingintahuan psikologis ini berperan dalam cara saya mendekati permainan. Saya selalu terpesona oleh outlier permainan, pemain yang tidak mungkin ketatatau tidak mungkin longgar – mereka yang tampaknya benar-benar mengabaikan kesadaran posisi, dan mereka yang sangat berhati-hati kemungkinan besar dibentuk oleh faktor-faktor yang ada dalam hidup mereka bahkan sebelum mereka belajar cara bermain kartu.

Saya selalu mencoba untuk memahami dan menilai seseorang terlebih dahulu, dari perspektif kemanusiaan mereka, dan kemudian mencari tahu bagaimana “tipe karakter” itu akan bermain kartu.

Pertumbuhan Permainan

Beberapa faktor telah berkontribusi pada lonjakan popularitas poker langsung baru-baru ini dalam beberapa tahun terakhir. Faktor penting pertama adalah rasa bosan yang banyak dialami selama pandemi Covid-19. Selain itu, kemunculan streamer poker dan ketersediaan game streaming dengan taruhan tinggi telah menarik perhatian para penggemar.

Selain itu, operator poker telah terlibat dalam persaingan yang ketat, berusaha untuk menawarkan rangkaian turnamen yang unggul dengan hadiah yang dijamin lebih besar. Perlu juga mempertimbangkan pengaruh dari crypto booming, yang telah memberi pemain profesional dan rekreasi sarana keuangan yang meningkat.

Sebagai hasil dari ledakan poker ini dan proliferasi permainan di saluran media sosial, ada banyak diskusi seputar peran pemain profesional dalam menciptakan suasana meja yang menyenangkan. Mereka diharapkan memiliki kehadiran meja yang positif, terlibat dalam aksi, bermain dengan kecepatan tinggi, memiliki keterampilan percakapan yang baik, dan berkontribusi pada dinamika sosial permainan secara keseluruhan.


Alex Livingston tertawa bersama Dario di Main Event Table

Sementara banyak yang berpendapat bahwa kualitas-kualitas ini sangat penting untuk pertumbuhan poker jangka panjang, yang lain berpendapat bahwa poker adalah permainan zero-sum, bahwa tidak semua kepribadian tertarik pada obrolan ringan atau bersosialisasi di meja, bahwa beberapa orang (termasuk profesional) membutuhkan lebih banyak waktu untuk berpikir, atau bahkan banyak profesional yang bersosialisasi dan memberikan tindakan sebenarnya palsu dan / atau manipulatif.

Sebagai seseorang yang selalu tertarik pada aspek sosial dan psikologis permainan, saya pasti berada di kubu yang percaya bahwa membuat permainan lebih menyenangkan (apa pun artinya bagi Anda) akan membuat poker lebih baik dalam jangka panjang.

“Bagi saya, tujuan jangka panjang saya tentu saja mencari nafkah dengan bermain game, tetapi saya lebih suka menikmati lingkungan saya saat melakukannya.”

Ini tidak berarti saya pikir setiap profesional memiliki tanggung jawab di arena ini – dan saya tahu bahwa untuk beberapa introvert atau mereka yang berasal dari latar belakang online, sebagian besar dari ini tidak akan datang dengan sendirinya. Setidaknya bagi saya, saya menemukan bahwa memberikan tindakan dan memiliki kepribadian yang ramah di meja adalah sama-sama menguntungkan. Bagi banyak orang nonprofesional, mereka tidak berharap menang dalam jangka panjang, dan salah satu tujuan utama mereka adalah bersenang-senang.

Bagaimana saya berhasil Memasukkan Psikologi di Poker

Kenikmatan inti terletak pada berpartisipasi dalam permainan di mana pemain tidak hanya terlibat dalam gameplay tetapi juga secara aktif membina suasana sosial yang penuh dengan tawa dan persahabatan. Terlepas dari investasi finansial saya dalam permainan, saya menemukan kepuasan besar dalam tindakan bersosialisasi.

Selain itu, dari sudut pandang strategis, alasan terbesar saya menikmati jenis permainan ini adalah memungkinkan saya untuk memanfaatkan dan mengembangkan apa yang saya anggap sebagai bagian terkuat dari permainan saya – pemahaman psikologis saya, dan kemampuan saya untuk menyesuaikan diri dengan tipe lawan yang berbeda.

Dengan melibatkan lawan saya dalam percakapan tentang kehidupan sehari-hari mereka, mendorong batas mereka dengan 3 taruhan berturut-turut, dan menggunakan berbagai teknik ukuran taruhan seperti taruhan rendah dan taruhan berlebihan, serta menampilkan tebing dan tangan yang kuat, saya dapat secara efektif mengekstraksi informasi berharga dari reaksi mereka.

Saya selalu terbuka untuk mengungkapkan banyak tentang gaya bermain saya sendiri selama satu tangan, menaruh kepercayaan pada kemampuan saya untuk menyesuaikan diri dengan cepat atau memanfaatkan informasi yang diperoleh untuk keuntungan saya.

Pelajaran Hidup Dari Meja Poker

Saya memahami dan menghargai bahwa beberapa profesional tidak akan merasa seperti ini, dan mereka memiliki hak untuk bermain dengan cara mereka sendiri dan berperilaku di meja. Tetapi sementara saya secara pribadi membenci politik permainan pribadi, saya juga memahami alasan mengapa uang tunai bergerak ke arah itu, seolah-olah saya adalah pemain yang kalah, saya setidaknya ingin bersenang-senang dengan kerumunan yang bersama saya.

Bersandar pada aspek psikologis permainan dan menyadari sisi-sisi yang dapat diperoleh hanya dengan memahami kepribadian lawan Anda dengan lebih baik dapat melayani tujuan meningkatkan tingkat kemenangan Anda dan membuat lingkungan di meja lebih menyenangkan bagi semua orang.

Lihat pemikiran Alex tentang dunia poker setelah menempati posisi ke-3 di Acara Utama WSOP 2019:


Sebagai seseorang yang dibesarkan dalam permainan kartu, saya mengembangkan daya tarik untuk gaya dan pendekatan yang unik dari sesama pemain. Keingintahuan ini terbawa ke poker, di mana saya menemukan pentingnya memahami lawan di level yang lebih dalam. Saya sangat percaya bahwa membina lingkungan yang menyenangkan dan menarik dapat berkontribusi pada pertumbuhan jangka panjang dan kenikmatan poker.

Fifth Circuit Remands PredictIt Case ke Pengadilan Negeri

Atas perintah Pengadilan Banding Sirkuit Kelima, Prediksikan dan rekan penggugatnya akan melakukannya agar perkaranya disidangkan di Pengadilan Negeri, dan pasar berjangka politik dapat terus beroperasi sampai selesai. Panel Sirkuit Kelima mengeluarkan keputusan pada 21 Juli menyusul perpecahan 2-1 suara. Hakim Stuart Duncan menulis pendapat mayoritas, dengan Hakim James Ho setuju dan Hakim James Graves tidak setuju.

Keputusan itu diambil segera setelah upaya terakhir oleh Komisi Perdagangan Berjangka Komoditas (CFTC) untuk membujuk pengadilan agar berubah pikiran. CFTC adalah terdakwa dalam kasus tersebut dan menunjukkan apa yang dirasakannya preseden Mahkamah Agung baru-baru ini ditetapkan di dalam Amerika Serikat v. Texas.

Hakim Duncan dan Ho mengisyaratkan cukup awal dalam proses bahwa mereka cenderung memihak PredictIt. Keduanya ditunjuk mantan Presiden DonaldTrump, yang tujuannya termasuk melemahkan kekuatan CFTC.

PredictIt beroperasi seperti pertukaran komoditas, sehingga berada di bawah lingkup CFTC. Namun, “komoditas” yang dimaksud efektif bertaruh pada apakah peristiwa politik tertentu terjadi atau tidak, seperti calon tertentu yang memenangkan pemilihan.

CFTC biasanya tidak mengizinkan pertukaran seperti itu. Namun, itu mengabulkan Universitas Victoria Wellington janji untuk tidak campur tangan dengan pertukaran semacam itu jika itu untuk tujuan penelitian. Idenya adalah bahwa sekelompok investor, mengikuti kepentingan keuangan yang mereka rasakan, adalah prediktor hasil politik yang lebih baik daripada pakar individu. Dalam beberapa kesempatan, hal itu terbukti.

Namun, pada Agustus 2022, CFTC mencabut suratnya, membahayakan masa depan situs. Gugatan oleh PredictIt dan beberapa penggugat lainnya menyusul, khususnya bukan termasuk Universitas Victoria sendiri.

Kembali ke Titik Awal, Tapi Dengan Jam Dijeda

Kasus ini dimulai dengan buruk untuk PredictIt dan rekan penggugatnya, karena Pengadilan Distrik untuk Distrik Barat Texas mengabaikan permintaan perintah pengadilan terhadap CFTC. Namun, Sirkuit Kelima telah memutuskan bahwa Pengadilan Negeri keliru dalam melakukannya dan telah menyerahkan kasus tersebut ke Pengadilan Negeri dengan instruksi untuk memasukkan putusan pendahuluan sebelum melanjutkan kasus tersebut.

Keputusan Sirkuit Kelima adalah kemenangan yang signifikan untuk PredictIt. Namun, itu bukan kemenangan mutlak. Itu hanya berarti kasusnya dimulai lagi, dari bawah. Namun, yang paling penting adalah bahwa keputusan awal akan memungkinkan PredictIt untuk terus beroperasi sampai kasusnya selesai.

Saat CFTC pertama kali menarik surat tanpa tindakan, mereka merekomendasikan PredictIt menghentikan operasi paling lambat 15 Februari 2023. Banyak kontrak pasar yang masih terbuka pada saat itu, dan tidak jelas bagaimana PredictIt seharusnya menutup posisi tersebut dengan peristiwa politik yang masih belum terselesaikan.

Distorsi pasar dan kecemasan pengguna adalah hasil yang dapat diprediksi. Ini adalah di antara luka-luka yang ditunjukkan penggugat dalam memperdebatkan manfaat kasus mereka.

Perintah tersebut berarti bahwa tenggat waktu ini – yang telah berlalu – tidak akan berlaku, begitu pula yang lainnya. CFTC akan menjadi tidak dapat mengambil tindakan terhadap PredictIt sementara kasusnya berjalan. Itu akan menjadi kabar baik bagi semua orang yang masih berdagang di bursa karena prosesnya mungkin memakan waktu lama. Apa pun hasilnya di Pengadilan Distrik, kemungkinan besar kasus tersebut akan berakhir kembali di Sirkuit Kelima dengan naik banding oleh pihak yang kalah.

Poin Kesepakatan, Ketidaksepakatan

Meskipun Hakim Graves berbeda pendapat, dia setuju dengan rekan-rekannya setidaknya dalam satu hal. Secara khusus, dia tidak menerima argumen CFTC yang memutuskannya cabut surat Agustus 2022-nya dan mengeluarkan yang baru membuat kasus ini diperdebatkan.

Namun, Graves berpendapat bahwa dia tidak akan mengeluarkan perintah pengadilan karena penggugat, dalam pandangannya, tidak mungkin memenangkan kasus tersebut. Dia menunjukkan bahwa pengadilan seharusnya hanya memberikan perintah awal ketika empat hal benar:

  • Penggugat memiliki “kemungkinan besar” untuk menang,
  • Ada “ancaman substansial” dari cedera yang tidak dapat diperbaiki tanpa perintah,
  • Cedera itu melebihi cedera yang ditimbulkan oleh perintah itu sendiri pada pihak lain, dan
  • Perintah itu tidak bertentangan dengan kepentingan umum.

Perbedaan pendapat Hakim Graves menunjukkan dia merasa alasan mereka tidak mungkin berhasil adalah karena itu surat tanpa tindakan tidak memiliki bobot yang cukup untuk campur tangan pengadilan dalam penerbitan atau pencabutannya. Dalam kata-katanya:

Saya belum pernah menemukan contoh di mana pengadilan telah memutuskan bahwa “surat tanpa tindakan” merupakan tindakan akhir yang diambil oleh agensi. Menariknya, mayoritas mengutip tidak ada kasus seperti itu. Sebaliknya, surat tanpa tindakan secara teratur ditemukan tidak mengikat dan tidak memiliki otoritas hukum, menghalangi peninjauannya.

Dalam hal ini, Hakim Ho sebenarnya setuju dengan Graves:

Teori penggugat tentang tindakan agen akhir diakui bertentangan dengan preseden rangkaian saudara kita. Sepengetahuan saya, tidak ada sirkuit yang menyatakan bahwa surat tanpa tindakan atau penarikannya cukup untuk menjadi “tindakan keagenan terakhir” di bawah Undang-Undang Prosedur Administratif. Dan beberapa berpendapat sebaliknya.

Dia tidak melihat ini sebagai malapetaka kasus, tetapi persetujuannya hangat, menunjukkan bahwa keputusan tegas tentang masalah itu membutuhkan pengadilan:

Karena itu, kami tidak perlu mencapai kesimpulan pasti tentang masalah ini saat ini. Sebagaimana dirinci dalam pendapat mayoritas, masalah yang disajikan dalam kasus ini cukup dekat sehingga Penggugat telah menunjukkan kemungkinan sukses yang substansial[.] ‘Tujuan dari putusan pendahuluan hanyalah untuk mempertahankan posisi relatif para pihak sampai sidang atas dasar kelayakan dapat diadakan.’

Secara seimbang, tampaknya PredictIt telah memenangkan pertempuran tetapi masih menghadapi perjuangan yang berat jika berharap untuk memenangkan perang.